Norman Laurence v. A.T. Wall, et al

Filing 47

ORDER adopting in its entirety 45 Report and Recommendations, dismissing with prejudice the 23 Amended Complaint in its entirety. The instant dismissal constitutes Plaintiff's "third strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 6/8/2011. (Duhamel, John)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND NORMAN LAURENCE, JR. v. CA 07-081 fll- ASHBEL T. WALL, et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Objection (Docket #46) to a Report and Recommendation (Docket #45) issued by Magistrate Judge Almond on May 18, 2011. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiffs objection, and the history of the many lawsuits filed by this inmate as described in the Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Almond. The Court finds no merit in Plaintiffs Objection. The Court also finds that the Report and Recommendation accurately describes the deficiencies in Plaintiffs Complaint. Further, the Court finds that Plaintiff, having now filed five separate actions, all involving the same or similar complaints, has now qualified for treatment pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b). This dismissal shall constitute the "third strike" for purposes of 28 U.S. C. § 1915(g). SO ORDERED: Mary M. L I Chief United States District Judge June ~ ,2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?