D'Amario, III v. Kinch

Filing 16

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations.; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case- So Ordered by Judge D. Brock Hornby on 8/13/09. (Barletta, Barbara)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) ) ) v. ) ) ) KENNETH D. COLLINS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ------------------------------------------------ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III, ) PLAINTIFF ) ) v. ) ) EDWARD C. ROY, ET AL., ) DEFENDANTS ) ------------------------------------------------ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III, ) PLAINTIFF ) ) v. ) ) HENRY S. KINCH, JR., ) DEFENDANT ) ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III, PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 08-490-DBH CIVIL NO. 09-38-DBH CIVIL NO. 09-106-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Upon de novo review, I AFFIRM the Magistrate Judge's recommended decisions of dismissal in these three cases.1 No evidentiary hearing is necessary or appropriate. 1 The plaintiff Arthur D'Amario has filed the same objection in each of his three cases and, therefore, I treat them together in this Order. I also remind the plaintiff of my June 5, 2008, Order in D'Amario v. United States, 251 F.R.D. 63, 64 (D. Me. 2008), warning him against continued frivolous filings and the likelihood of an injunction against his excessive number of groundless lawsuits. The plaintiff should take my 2008 warning into account in deciding whether to pay the filing fees to re-file these lawsuits. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT OF MAINE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?