Baptista v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated within the instant order, the request for attorney's fees and costs for the period between January 1, 2012 to conclusion of this case is GRANTED as specified, and DENIED otherwise; and the motion for reimbursement of expenses for the same time period is GRANTED. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M Lisi on 4/3/2012. (Duhamel, John)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
NANCY A. BAPTISTA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs
v.
C.A. No. 010-467-ML
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE
COMPANY, UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
Defendants
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This ERISA case,
beneficiaries
brought on November 17,
2010 on behalf of
under certain employee benefit plans
administered by
the
defendants,
settlement on March 14,
2012.
was
approved
for
insured and
class
action
Baptista v. Mutual of Omaha Ins.
Co., C.A. No. 010-467-ML, 2012 WL 896181
(D.R.I. March 14, 2010).
In addition to granting final approval of the settlement, the Court
granted class counsel's request for reimbursement of actual costs
of $10,132.91 incurred through December 31, 2011, and it awarded an
incentive
award
of
$2,000
to
the
named
plaintiff
for
her
applied
the
participation in this litigation.
With
respect
to
attorneys'
fees,
the
Court
lodestar approach 1 to determine reasonable compensation of class
counsel for
the actual work performed in this
litigation.
The
See e.g. In re Thirteen Appeals Arising Out of San Juan Dupont
Plaza Hotel Fire Litig., 56 F.3d 295, 307 (1st Cir. 1995).
1
Court approved attorney's fees of $358,807.75 for work performed
through
December
31,
reimbursement
of
$10,132.91 for actual costs incurred in the same time period.
At
that time,
class
additional
$50,550
2011,
together
with
counsel anticipated that they would incur an
in
attorney's
fees,
bringing
the
total
of
requested attorneys' fees and costs (under the lodestar approach)
to $419,490.66.
For reasons set forth in detail in the Memorandum and Order,
the
Court approved the
affidavits
and
billing
requested attorneys'
records,
but
fees
declined
supported by
class
counsel's
request to multiply the lodestar figures by applying a 1. 55 factor.
Baptista v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 2012 WL 896181 at *5 through
*7.
The Court also advised class counsel to provide "detailed
information
for
any
work
performed
after
January
1,
2012
in
bringing this case to completion." Id. at *7.
On
March
declarations
19,
and
2012,
class
billing
counsel
records,
submitted
requesting
supplemental
an
additional
$67,062.50 for work performed from January 1, 2012 to March 15,
2012,
bringing
$425,870.25.
the
In
total
addition,
of
requested
counsel
attorneys'
requested
fees
reimbursement
to
of
additional expense of $1,901.08 for costs expended in the same time
period, bringing the expense total to $12,033.99.
A review of the submitted supplemental time and expense sheets
for class counsel indicates that a significant number of the time
2
entries deal with fee-related work and that counsel, for the most
part, applied their considerable hourly rates (ranging from $425 to
$525 per hour)
to
such work.
Although time
spent on
seeking
attorneys' fees is generally compensable, it may be compensated at
a lower rate.
The First Circuit has repeatedly held that "time
reasonably expended in connection with fee applications is itself
compensable
. but,
since time spent in this exercise often
amounts to little more than 'documenting what a lawyer did and why
he or she did it,'
rate."
. it may fairly be compensated at a reduced
Brewster v. Dukakis, 3 F.3d 488, 494 (1st Cir. 1993) (citing
Lund v. Affleck, 587 F.2d 75, 77 (1st Cir. 1978)) (quoting Gabriele
v. Southworth, 712 F.2d 1505, 1507 (1st Cir. 1983)).
As
instant
noted in the March 14,
case
was
settled
2012 Memorandum and Order,
within
weeks
of
filing
the
the
initial
complaint and was concluded without any significant discovery.
Baptista
at
*6.
By
September
30,
2011,
the
Court
had
preliminarily approved the proposed settlement and the notice to
the settlement class
(Docket #30).
By December 31,
2011,
counsel had logged a total of 762 hours in this case,
billable rates between $425 and $525 per hour.
class
asserting
In light of the
foregoing, and in consideration of the First Circuit's holding in
Brewster v.
Dukakis,
the Court finds
that,
in
this
case,
work
related to supporting a request for attorney's fees is reasonably
compensated at $200/hour.
3
(1) Barrett and Associates seek compensation for 53.4 hours at
$525/hour for attorney's fees and 7.6 hours at $150/hour for work
performed by a paralegal.
Class counsel assessed 27.5 hours for
work
which
on
final
documents,
includes
the
counsel's application for attorneys' fees.
brief
supporting
The Court notes that
the memorandum in support of the application for attorney's fees
was of nearly equal length to the supporting memorandum for final
approval of this class action settlement.
Therefore,
12 of the
27.5 hours spent on preparing final documents will be compensated
at $200 per hour.
The request for compensation of paralegal fees
is granted in full.
fees of $25,275
$200/hour
(2)
Barrett and Associates are awarded attorney's
(41.4 hours at $525/hour = $21,735 + 12 hours at
= $2,400, plus $1,140 in paralegal fees).
Jeffrey G. Casurella seeks compensation for 32 hours at
$525/hour for attorney fees.
The time entries indicate that, of
those 32 hours, 22.3 hours relate, at least in part, to researching
and editing the fee brief. Therefore, ten of the 22.3 hours will be
compensated at $200 per hour.
The total amount awarded to this
counsel is $13,550 (22 hours at $525/hour
$200/hour
=
= $11,550 + 10 hours at
$2, 000).
(3) John Bell seeks compensation for 30.6 hours at $525/hour,
of which at least 5. 5 hours are fee-related,
and 2. 7 hours at
$425/hour for associate counsel, of which at least 1.8 hours are
fee-related.
Attorney
Bell
is
awarded
4
fees
in
the
amount
of
$14,277.50 (25.1 hours at $525
=
$13,177.50 + 5.5 hours at $200
=
$1,100), plus fees for associate counsel of$ 742.50(0.9 hours at
$425
=
$382.50 + 1.8 hours at $200
=
$360), for a total of $15,020.
(4) Stephen Linder seeks compensation for seven hours of his
time at $485/hour and 3.2 hours for paralegal work. Because the
time expended on the finalization of this case was reasonable and
it appears
that any fee-related work was performed by a
legal
assistant at a rate of $150/hour, the Court grants the request for
attorney's fees of $3,875.00.
With respect to reimbursement of additional expenses in the
amount of $1,901. 08,
supporting records,
the Court
finds
that,
upon
those expenses are reasonable,
review of the
and they are
awarded in full.
Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the request for attorney's fees
and costs for the period between January 1, 2012 to conclusion of
this case is GRANTED as specified herein, and DENIED otherwise; and
the motion for reimbursement of expenses for the same time period
is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/Mary M. Lisi
Mary M. Lisi
Chief United States District Judge
April 3, 2012
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?