Pingatore et al v. Town of Johnston et al

Filing 25

ORDER adopting 21 Report and Recommendations; denying 15 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 12/6/11. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) v. ) ) TOWN OF JOHNSTON, et al., ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) DAVID PINGATORE, et al., Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 11-068-S ORDER William E. Smith, United States District Judge. The matter is before the Court on Defendants’ objection to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond’s Report and Recommendation, dated October 31, 2011. (ECF No. 21.) Magistrate Judge Almond recommended that Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) liability be granted and that Defendants’ cross-motion be denied. such objections is de novo. This Court’s review of See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Upon careful review of the Report and Recommendation, it is clear that Defendants’ objection is without merit. press the same arguments and case law as they Defendants did before Magistrate Judge Almond -- namely, that the regular rate can be stipulated by the parties. These arguments remain unavailing. See O’Brien v. Town of Agawam, 350 F.3d 279, 294 (1st Cir. 2003) (“[T]he regular rate cannot be stipulated by the parties; instead, the rate must be discerned from what actually happens under the governing employment contract.”). The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond, filed on October 31, 2011, is accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED; Defendants’ cross-motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ William E. Smith William E. Smith United States District Judge Date: December 6, 2011 2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?