Pingatore et al v. Town of Johnston et al
Filing
25
ORDER adopting 21 Report and Recommendations; denying 15 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 12/6/11. (Jackson, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
v.
)
)
TOWN OF JOHNSTON, et al.,
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________)
DAVID PINGATORE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
C.A. No. 11-068-S
ORDER
William E. Smith, United States District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on Defendants’ objection to
Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond’s Report and Recommendation,
dated October 31, 2011.
(ECF No. 21.)
Magistrate Judge Almond
recommended that Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment
as to Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) liability be granted and
that Defendants’ cross-motion be denied.
such objections is de novo.
This Court’s review of
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Upon careful review of the Report and Recommendation, it is
clear that Defendants’ objection is without merit.
press
the
same
arguments
and
case
law
as
they
Defendants
did
before
Magistrate Judge Almond -- namely, that the regular rate can be
stipulated by the parties.
These arguments remain unavailing.
See O’Brien v. Town of Agawam, 350 F.3d 279, 294 (1st Cir. 2003)
(“[T]he
regular
rate
cannot
be
stipulated
by
the
parties;
instead, the rate must be discerned from what actually happens
under the governing employment contract.”).
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lincoln
D. Almond, filed on October 31, 2011, is accepted pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for partial
summary judgment is GRANTED; Defendants’ cross-motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ William E. Smith
William E. Smith
United States District Judge
Date: December 6, 2011
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?