Arroyo v. State of Massachusetts

Filing 18

ORDER denying 10 Motion for Assessment of Damages; denying as moot 13 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting 14 Report and Recommendations; and dismissing the 7 Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 6/28/13. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) DEVAL PATRICK, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) MICHAEL RAY ARROYO, C.A. No. 12-753 S ORDER On February 11, 2013, Plaintiff Michael Ray Arroyo, who had previously filed a been pro granted se, leave handwritten to proceed Amended in forma Complaint (ECF pauperis, No. 7), naming “The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Deval Patrick” as the sole defendant. Arroyo subsequently filed a Motion for Assessment of Damages (ECF No. 10) as well as a Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 13). On May 6, 2013, Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), recommending Assessment of that Damages this and Court dismiss deny his Arroyo’s Amended sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Motion for Complaint sua Plaintiff filed a handwritten, and largely incoherent, response (ECF No. 16) to that Report and Recommendation on May 14, 2013. Because this Court agrees with Judge Sullivan’s analysis, it now adopts her Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for Assessment of Damages is DENIED, his Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, and his Motion moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ William E. Smith William E. Smith United States District Judge Date: June 28, 2013 for Default Judgment is DENIED as

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?