Wai Feng Trading Co. LTD et al v. Quick Fitting, Inc.
Filing
67
ORDER granting (49) Motion to Vacate Consolidation Order ; adopting (63) Report and Recommendations in case 1:13-cv-00033-S-PAS; granting (57) Motion to Vacate Consolidation Order; adopting (72) Report and Recommendations in case 1:13-cv-00056-S-PAS. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 8/22/14. Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-00033-S-PAS, 1:13-cv-00056-S-PAS(Jackson, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
QUICK FITTING, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
___________________________________)
)
QUICK FITTING, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WAI FENG TRADING CO., INC., and
)
EASTERN FOUNDRY & FITTINGS, INC., )
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________)
WAI FENG TRADING CO. LTD, and
EFF MANUFACTORY CO., LTD,
C.A. No. 13-033 S
C.A. No. 13-056 S
ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
On
May
30,
2014,
Magistrate
Judge
Patricia
A.
Sullivan
issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 63), recommending
that C.A. No. 13-33-S and C.A. No. 13-56-S be deconsolidated.
Magistrate Judge Sullivan further recommended that the motion of
Wai Feng Trading Co. Ltd. to sever Count III in C.A. No. 13-33S, so that it can be asserted as a counterclaim in C.A. No. 1356-S,
be
granted.
Finally,
Magistrate
Judge
Sullivan
recommended that this Court, on its own, sever Counts IV through
VII from Quick Fitting, Inc.’s First Amended Verified Complaint
in C.A. No. 13-56-S, and direct Quick Fitting, Inc. to amend its
answer
in
C.A.
No.
13-33-S
to
assert
those
counts
as
counterclaims.
No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.
Because this Court agrees with Judge Sullivan’s analysis, it
hereby
ACCEPTS
the
Report
and
Recommendation
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
William E. Smith
Chief Judge
Date: August 22, 2014
2
pursuant
to
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?