Seguin v. Suttell et al

Filing 106

ORDER denying #76 MOTION to Convene a Grand Jury to Investigate and Prosecute Corruption and Fraud Abusing the Courts; denying #78 MOTION for Recusal of the New Hampshire Federal Bench Pursuant to 28 USC Sec. 455(a)); denying #88 MOTION for Recusal of New Hampshire Federal Bench Under 28 USC sec. 455(a); denying #89 MOTION to Strike LR 302(d) as Impermissable Obstruction of Raising Court Con Claims; denying #90 MOTION to Change Venue; denying #95 MOTION to Vacate "All McCafferty's Orders"; denying #96 MOTION to Convene a Special Grand Jury to Investigate and Prosecute Corruption and Fraud Abusing the Court; granting in part and denying in part #97 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice of Patrice Livingston's Declarations in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Convene a Special Grand Jury. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B McCafferty (New Hampshire) on 12/10/2013. (Duhamel, John)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Mary Seguin
v.

Civil No. 13-cv-095-JNL-LM

Hon. Paul Suttell, et al.

O R D E R
Plaintiff's motions: to convene a grand jury (doc. nos. 76
and 96); to change venue, to recuse the New Hampshire bench, and
to vacate all orders issued by the magistrate judge (doc. nos.
78, 88, 90, and 95); and to strike a local rule (doc. no. 89),
are all DENIED for reasons stated in this court's prior rulings,
see Orders (doc. nos. 19, 61, 71, 72, and 86), and for
additional reasons stated in the Oct. 17, 2013, order (doc. no.
157) in Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12-SJM-LM (D.R.I.).

This

court notes that the court in Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12SJM-LM (D.R.I.), has denied essentially the same motions and
requests for relief.

See Endorsed Order (Nov. 7, 2013), in

Seguin v. Textron, No. 13-cv-12-SJM-LM (D.R.I.).

Plaintiff's

motion to take judicial notice of Patrice Livingston's
declaration and exhibits (doc. no. 97), is GRANTED IN PART, to
the extent that the court takes notice that the declaration and
exhibits, docketed in this case as Document No. 81, in fact

exist, but the court does not credit as true the contents of
those documents, or plaintiff's characterization of their
significance.

The motion (doc. no. 97) is DENIED in all other

respects.
SO ORDERED.

__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
December 10, 2013
cc:

Mary Seguin, pro se
Rebecca Tedford Partington, Esq.
Susan E. Urso, Esq.

LBM:nmd

2