Seguin v. Suttell et al

Filing 85

ORDER adopting #63 Report and Recommendations and denying as moot Defendants' #17 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Strike Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N Laplante (New Hampshire) on 10/18/2013. (Duhamel, John)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mary Sequin
v.

Civil No. 13-cv-95-JNL-LM

Paul Suttell et al

O R D E R

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated
September 24, 2013.

“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the

objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are
precluded on appeal.’”

School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988));

see also

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: October 18, 2013
cc:

Mary Seguin, pro se
Rebecca Tedford Partington, Esq.
Susan Urso, Esq.