Tavares v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Rhode Island

Filing 5

ORDER adopting in part 3 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 9/12/13. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF ) RHODE ISLAND, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) ROGERIO S. TAVARES, C.A. No. 13-521 S ORDER On July 15, 2013, Plaintiff Rogerio Tavares filed a pro se complaint against Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Rhode Island, containing vague allegations of employment discrimination. No. 1.) proceed (ECF Also on July 15, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to in Lincoln forma D. pauperis. Almond issued (ECF a No. 2.) Report Magistrate and Judge Recommendation, recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion and dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Subsequent to Judge (ECF No. 3.) Almond’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 4) and paid the filing fee. Thus, the amended complaint is now the operative pleading, and Judge Almond’s holding with respect to the initial complaint is moot. With respect to Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, this Court agrees with the analysis outlined in Judge Almond’s Report and Recommendation, to which Plaintiff has failed to object. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ William E. Smith William E. Smith United States District Judge Date: September 12, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?