Geigus v. Bergstresser et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations, and denying 8 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 10/6/2014. (A copy of the attached Order was forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 10/6/2014.) (Duhamel, John)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

GLORIA J. GEIGUS
v.

C.A. 14-318 ML

JAMES AND JUDITH BERGSTRESSER and
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
EMPLOYEES
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objection to a Report and Recommendation
issued by Magistrate Judge Almond on September 12, 2014 (Docket #9). The Court has
considered Plaintiff’s objection and, even affording Plaintiff some latitude because of her pro se
status, this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Almond’s conclusion as to Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with Fed. R. App. P. 24 (a)(1)(B) or (a)(1)(C). This Court also concurs in Magistrate
Judge Almond’s assessment as to the lack of a legal or factual basis for the claims Plaintiff seeks
to press.
For these reasons, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

SO ORDERED:

/s/ Mary M. Lisi
Mary M. Lisi
United States District Judge
October 6, 2014