Botelho v. AT Wall

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendations; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and ordering Plaintiff to pay $5.00 Filing Fee on or before 5/5/15. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 3/20/15. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) A.T. WALL, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) JOSEPH BOTELHO, C.A. No. 14-516 S ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. On December 10, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in the above-captioned matter (ECF No. 3), denying Joseph Botelho’s (“Petitioner”) Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (“Application,” ECF No. 2). Judge Almond found that Petitioner had the ability to pay the required $5.00 filing fee, based on the balance of Petitioner’s prison account, and his prison job. Petitioner objected to the R&R by filing a form indicating that he had attempted subsequent to to draw issuance of $5.00 the from R&R, insufficient funds (ECF No. 4). his but was prison account denied due to This Court agrees with Judge Almond’s rationale and accepts the R&R, but due to Petitioner’s unsuccessful attempt to pay the $5.00 filing fee, provides Petitioner 45 days from the date of this Order to pay. If Petitioner fails to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The R&R is hereby ADOPTED, and Petitioner directed to pay the $5.00 filing fee within 45 days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. William E. Smith Chief Judge Date: March 20, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?