Nickerson v. Wall
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting in its entirety 15 Report and Recommendations: DENYING 8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; DENYING 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. -- Petitioner shall, on or before October 15, 2015, advise this Cou rt as to whether he will voluntarily dismiss his "unexhausted claims"; i.e., Grounds One and Three (pre-trial publicity) and the Ground Two sub-issue identified at pp. 19 and 20 of the Report and Recommendation. If Petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this Court will dismiss the entire petition as a mixed petition. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 9/15/2015. (Duhamel, John)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
JASON LAMONTE NICKERSON
CA 15-014ML
v.
ASHBEL T. WALL
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's objections to the Report and
Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Sullivan on July 7, 2015 (Docket #15). Having
now considered Petitioner's objections and the Report and Recommendation wherein the
Magistrate Judge carefully and thoroughly unravels Petitioner's exhausted and unexhausted
claims, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Court, therefore,
makes the following orders:
1.
Petitioner shall, on or before October 15, 2015, advise this Court as to whether he
will voluntarily dismiss his "unexhausted" claims; i.e., Grounds One and Three
(pre-trial publicity) and the Ground Two sub-issue identified at pp. 19 and 20 of
the Report and Recommendation;
2.
If Petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this Court will dismiss the entire
petition as a mixed petition;
3.
Petitioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket #8) is DENIED;
4.
Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket #9) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED:
/s/ Mary M. Lisi
Mary M. Lisi
United States District Judge
September 15, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?