Guerra v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections

Filing 19

ORDER granting 13 Motion for Sanctions; adopting 16 Report and Recommendations and dismissing case without prejudice. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 9/23/2016. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT ) OF CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) FERNANDO GUERRA, C.A. No. 15-445 S PAS ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. On July 6, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this pro se civil rights case. (ECF No. 16.) Magistrate Judge Sullivan recommended that this Court grant the Rhode Island Department of Corrections’ (“RIDOC”) Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 13) and dismiss this action because of Plaintiff’s continued failure to respond orders. to discovery Plaintiff requests did not and object abide to the by numerous R&R. The court RIDOC objected to Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s recommendation that the case be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 17.) According to the RIDOC, Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute his case, even after receiving multiple warnings that failing to do so would result in dismissal, warrants dismissal with prejudice. 1 While the RIDOC’s objection is well taken, the Court nonetheless agrees on balance with Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s recommendation; dismissal is a harsh sanction in and of itself, and in deference to Plaintiff’s pro se status, dismissal without prejudice is sanction enough in this instance. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES the objection and ACCEPTS the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________ William E. Smith Chief Judge Date: September 23, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?