Sinclair v. Sampson et al

Filing 70

ORDER denying 44 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 59 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 2/27/2017. (Jackson, Ryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ___________________________________ ) LEILA C. SINCLAIR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 16-127 S ) CRAIG S. SAMPSON, ESQUIRE, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim of Defendants Kathleen J. Ennen, William E. Jenkins, and Theodore L. Jenkins, Jr. (ECF No. 44.) This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Almond recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 59.) Because Plaintiff has not filed an objection to that recommendation, and the deadline for objections has passed, Plaintiff’s objections, if any, are waived. See United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 59) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim (ECF No. 44) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. William E. Smith Chief Judge Date: February 27, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?