Sinclair v. Sampson et al
Filing
70
ORDER denying 44 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 59 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 2/27/2017. (Jackson, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
___________________________________
)
LEILA C. SINCLAIR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
C.A. No. 16-127 S
)
CRAIG S. SAMPSON, ESQUIRE,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________)
ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
Before
the
Court
is
Plaintiff’s
Motion
to
Dismiss
the
Amended Counterclaim of Defendants Kathleen J. Ennen, William E.
Jenkins, and Theodore L. Jenkins, Jr. (ECF No. 44.) This matter
was referred to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Almond recommended
that Plaintiff’s Motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation,
ECF No. 59.) Because Plaintiff has not filed an objection to
that recommendation, and the deadline for objections has passed,
Plaintiff’s objections, if any, are waived. See United States v.
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). The Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 59) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s Motion to
Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim (ECF No. 44) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
William E. Smith
Chief Judge
Date: February 27, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?