Ford v. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER denying 18 Motion to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner; granting 19 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner; adopting 20 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 2/27/2017. (Jackson, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
___________________________________
)
TRINA L. FORD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
)
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)
C.A. No. 16-146 S
ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of Defendant’s decision to
deny Plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits. (See Compl., ECF
No. 1.)
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Reverse
the Defendant’s
Final Decision (ECF No. 18) and Defendant filed a Motion for an
Order
Affirming
the
Commissioner’s
Decision
(ECF
No.
19).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this matter was referred
to
Magistrate
“substantial
Commissioner’s
that
Judge
Lincoln
evidence
in
decision,”
Plaintiff’s
Motion
D.
Almond.
[the]
record
Magistrate
Judge
be
denied
and
After
to
finding
support
Almond
Defendant’s
the
recommended
Motion
be
granted. (Report and Recommendation 1, ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff
has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation and
the
deadline
for
any
such
objection
has
passed.
Plaintiff’s
objections, if
any, are
therefore
waived and the Report and
Recommendation is ADOPTED. See United States v. Valencia-Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse
(ECF No. 18) is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion to Affirm (ECF No.
19) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
William E. Smith
Chief Judge
Date: February 27, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?