Sugar Fox 218, LLC v. Greython Construction, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations; denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Reset Deadlines: Greython Construction, LLC answer due 5/30/2017.- So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 5/9/2017. (Barletta, Barbara)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
______________________________

)
SUGAR FOX 218, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GREYTHON CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)

C.A. No. 16-470 S

ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
Defendant has requested that the Court dismiss this action
or, in the alternative, transfer it to the District of Connecticut.
(ECF No. 6.) Defendant’s motion was referred to Magistrate Judge
Lincoln D. Almond for a Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judge
Almond’s Report and Recommendation recommended that Defendant’s
motion be denied. (ECF No. 13.) Defendant did not object to the
Report and Recommendation1, and instead submitted an Assented to
Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 15), requesting additional time to
respond to the complaint so that the parties may first participate
in mediation. The Report and Recommendation

(ECF No. 13) is

therefore ACCEPTED, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is

Objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed
within fourteen days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); LR Cv 72.
Objections not filed within that timeframe are waived. See United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986); Park
Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603, 605 (1st Cir.
1980).
1

DENIED, and Defendant’s Assented to Motion to Extend Time (ECF No.
15) is GRANTED. As requested, Defendant has until May 30 to respond
to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

William E. Smith
Chief Judge
Date: May 9, 2017

2