Emrit v. Providence Housing Authority et al
ORDER dismissing 1 Complaint, granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and adopting 4 Report & Recommendation; further, plaintiff is hereby ordered to submit future filings to this Court in compliance with this Order. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 1/4/2017. (Jackson, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
C.A. No. 16-543 S
PROVIDENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY,
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
Recommendation (“R&R”) on October 25, 2016. (ECF No. 4.) The R&R
Prepayment of Fees (ECF No. 2) be granted but that the Complaint
Plaintiff be ordered to refrain from future filings in this
Court subject to certain exceptions. Plaintiff has not filed an
objection to the R&R.
determines that . . . the action . . . (i) is frivolous or
malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be
granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who
is immune from such relief.”
Court agrees with the R&R’s determination that, “even applying .
dismissal is required.” (R&R 3.) Plaintiff has failed to exhaust
administrative remedies for his claim. Additionally, Plaintiff
has not alleged a set of plausible facts on which relief could
conclusion that some prophylactic order is warranted in this
identical issues in various federal courts. (R&R 5-6.) The Court
ADOPTS the R&R’s recommendation that Plaintiff be limited in his
future filings in this Court and ORDERS as follows:
Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit is prohibited from
filing any additional complaints or other papers in
this Court, except for filings in currently pending
cases to object to a Report and Recommendation of a
Magistrate Judge or to effect an appeal from this
Court, without first obtaining the prior written
approval of a District Judge of this Court. If
Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit wishes to file any
additional complaints or other papers in this Court,
he shall file a written petition seeking leave of
Court to do so. The petition must be accompanied by
copies of the documents sought to be filed, and a
certification under oath that there is a good faith
basis for filing them in Federal Court. The Clerk of
Court shall accept the documents, mark them received,
and forward them to a District Judge of this Court for
action on the petition for leave to file.
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s Application to
Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Lastly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to submit future filings to
this Court in compliance with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
William E. Smith
Date: January 4, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?