Karmue v. Remington et al
Filing
109
ORDER: denying 79 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 100 Report and Recommendations - So Ordered by District Judge Landya B McCafferty on 3/4/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Kormahyah Karmue
v.
Case No. 17-cv-107-LM-AKJ
David Remington et al
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated February 1, 2019 (doc. No. 100).
“‘[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
Sch.
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v.
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper
notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: March 4, 2019
cc:
Kormahyah Karmue, pro se
Bethany N. Wong, Esq.
Matthew C. Reeber, Esq.
Patrick J. McBurney, Esq.
Michael G. Sarli, Esq.
Per C. Vaage, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?