Karmue v. Remington et al

Filing 109

ORDER: denying 79 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 100 Report and Recommendations - So Ordered by District Judge Landya B McCafferty on 3/4/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Kormahyah Karmue v. Case No. 17-cv-107-LM-AKJ David Remington et al ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 1, 2019 (doc. No. 100). “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty Chief Judge Date: March 4, 2019 cc: Kormahyah Karmue, pro se Bethany N. Wong, Esq. Matthew C. Reeber, Esq. Patrick J. McBurney, Esq. Michael G. Sarli, Esq. Per C. Vaage, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?