Boudreau v. Petit et al

Filing 216

ORDER : On September 24, 2024, Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan filed a Report and Recommendation (R&R) (ECF No. 169 ) recommending that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss of non-parties John, Donald, and Steve Lussier, which sought to dismi ss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint to the extent that it asserts claims against them (ECF No. 140). After having carefully reviewed the relevant papers, the relevant law, and having heard no objections, the Court ACCEPTS the R&R and ADOPTS the rec ommendations and reasoning set forth therein.Accordingly, the Lussiers' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 140 ) is GRANTED; all claims against the Lussiers in the First Amended Compliant are dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 1/27/2025. (Potter, Carrie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND JASON BOUDREAU, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN PETIT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 1:17-CV-00301-MSM-PAS ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Mary S. McElroy, United States District Judge. On September 24, 2024, Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 169) recommending that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss of non-parties John, Donald, and Steve Lussier, which sought to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint to the extent that it asserts claims against them (ECF No. 140). After having carefully reviewed the relevant papers, the relevant law, and having heard no objections, the Court ACCEPTS the R&R and ADOPTS the recommendations and reasoning set forth therein. Accordingly, the Lussiers’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 140) is GRANTED; all claims against the Lussiers in the First Amended Compliant are dismissed with prejudice. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ Mary S. McElroy United States District Judge January 27, 2024 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?