Summer Infant (USA), Inc. v. TOMY International, Inc.

Filing 68

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS in its entirety the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 54 ). TOMYs motion (ECF No. 34 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The constructions recommended by the Magistrate in the R&R at p. 21, are adopted - So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 3/31/2020. (Urizandi, Nisshy)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SUMMER INFANT (USA), Inc. Plaintiff/Counter Defendant v. TOMY INTERNATIONAL, Inc. Defendant/Counter Claimant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 1:17-cv-00549-MSM-PAS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the objections of both the plaintiff (ECF No. 56) and the defendant (ECF No. 55) to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Patricia Sullivan (“R & R”, ECF 54) respecting the Motion for Claim Construction filed by TOMY, Inc. (ECF No. 34). While there were initially six disputed terms, the parties resolved two. (R & R at 2.) Both corporations construct, market and sell infant/toddler bathing tubs. TOMY holds U.S. Patent No. 6,578,209, titled “Tubs for Bathing Infants and Toddlers,” issued on June 17, 2003. On November 14, 2017, TOMY sent Summer Infant a cease and desist letter asserting patent infringement. The Motion for Claim Construction involves definitional meanings relevant to whether Summer Infant’s tub is sufficiently similar to TOMY’s to constitute patent infringement. The four terms allegedly requiring construction are “molded plastic body,” “seating surface(s),” “distal edges joined at a bottom surface apex,” and “wale.” (R & R, ECF No. 54 at 3.) I have reviewed the Magistrate’s R & R, read and considered the submissions of the parties, held a hearing on the objections, and independently reviewed the record. The Magistrate’s analysis is a painstaking, thorough and deliberative analysis of the exhibits, the arguments, and the relevant law. I therefore ADOPT it in its entirety. TOMY’s motion (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The constructions recommended by the Magistrate in the R & R at p. 21, are adopted. SO ORDERED: ______________________________________ Mary S. McElroy United States District Judge March 31, 2020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?