Mays v. Jefferson et al

Filing 11

ORDER directing Clerk of Court to set up a separate civil action for the plaintiff's claims against Aubrey Rennick. Aubrey Rennick terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/23/2010. (jpet, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA LeBryson Mays, Plaintiff, vs. Bernadette Jefferson; Aubrey Rennick, Defendant. __________________________________________ ) C/A No. 0:10-2284-TLW-PJG ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This is a civil action filed by a state prisoner. Therefore, in the event that a limitations issue arises, the plaintiff shall have the benefit of the holding in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner's pleading was filed at the moment of delivery to prison authorities for forwarding to District Court). Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) DSC, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. In an order filed in this case on September 15, 2010, the undersigned granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directed the plaintiff to answer Special Interrogatories as to whether the plaintiff intended to file one or two cases. The plaintiff has apprised the court that he intended to file two cases and that he is aware that he will incur a separate $350 filing fee for each case. (See ECF No. 9.) The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Aubrey Rennick as a defendant in the above-captioned case and to set up a separate civil action for the plaintiff's claims against Aubrey Rennick. The Clerk of Court is authorized to "separate" the pleadings relating to Bernadette Jefferson in the above-captioned case from the pleadings relating to Aubrey Rennick, and docket the pleadings relating to Aubrey Rennick in the new case. IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE September 23, 2010 Columbia, South Carolina Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?