CED Construction Partners Ltd v. Transportation Insurance Company et al

Filing 53

ORDER granting 51 Motion to Consolidate Cases, consolidating the action with case 0:11-cv-1243-JFA for the purposes of discovery and trial and directing that all future filings should display both captions. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/16/2011.(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION CED Construction Partners, Ltd., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Transportation Insurance Company, ) American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA ) and Pennsylvania National Security ) Insurance Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Penn National Security Insurance Company, Plaintiff, vs. Jose Trucking Corp. d/b/a G&P Contractors and CED Construction Partners, Ltd., Defendants. C/A No.: 0:10-cv-3155-JFA C/A No.: 0:11-cv-1243-JFA ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Pursuant to the consent motion to consolidate the above-captioned cases (ECF No. 51, C/A No. 0:10-cv-3155), and (ECF No. 52, C/A No. 0:11-cv-1243) the court hereby consolidates the cases for discovery and for trial. All further filings shall bear both captions. The parties are instructed to continue to file in both cases. 1 The court hereby instructs Penn National Security Insurance Company that if it wishes for its complaint in C/A No. 0:11-cv-01243-JFA to be construed as an amended answer and counterclaim in the primary action, it shall file such amended answer and counterclaim in the primary action, taking care to ensure that the pleading addresses each of the claims asserted in the complaint. The court hereby grants leave for Penn National Security Insurance Company to file the amended answer and counterclaim. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 16, 2011 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?