Cook v. United States of America
ORDER re service of 16 Amended Complaint filed by Darryl L Cook. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 4/12/2011. (jpet, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Darryl L. Cook,
United States of America,
) C/A No. 0:11-0320-RMG-PJG
This action is filed by a self-represented federal prisoner. Service of the complaint
by the U.S. Marshal was directed by Order dated March 28, 2011. (ECF No. 12.)
Subsequently, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 16.)
TO THE CLERK OF COURT:
The Clerk of Court is directed to regenerate the Notice of Electronic Filing (“NEF”)
for the Amended Complaint and this Order at the time of Defendant’s initial appearance
in this case. Service is effected on counsel for parties who have made an appearance in
this Court by the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system through a computer generated NEF.
Defendant is directed to file an answer to the Amended Complaint or otherwise
Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any documents filed
subsequent to the initial pleading must be served on parties. Unless otherwise ordered,
service of subsequently filed documents on a defendant represented by an attorney is
made on the attorney. Service on attorneys who have made an appearance in this Court
is effected by the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system through a computer generated
notice of electronic filing. However, prior to Defendant’s(s’) attorney making an
appearance in this Court, Plaintiff must serve Defendants with any documents Plaintiff files
subsequent to the initial pleading and file a certificate of service that states who was
served, what document was served, and how the document was served.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 12, 2011
Columbia, South Carolina
Paige J. Gossett
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?