Southern v. Asbestos Processing LLC et al

Filing 345

ORDER granting 344 Motion to Hold Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in Abeyance and to Stay the Deadline for Response to the Same, holding in abeyance the Plaintiff's 334 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and staying the deadline for Defendants' response until discovery is complete. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 09/09/2014.(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION Odell Parker; Ruth Parker; Larry Southern; Roy Southern; Yvonne Harris; and Barbara Patterson, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated in the State of South Carolina, Civil Action No. 0:11-cv-1800-JFA Plaintiffs, vs. Asbestos Processing, LLC; Richard H. Bishoff, PC; Richard H. Bishoff; John M. Deakle; A. Joel Bentley; A. Joel Bentley Law Office; William R. Couch; Couch Law Firm; David O. McCormick; Cumbest, Cumbest, Hunter & McCormick; Crymes G. Pittman; Pittman, Germany, Roberts & Welsh, LLP; John Michael Simms; and Lawyer John Doe and Jane Doe, ORDER Defendants. This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Hold Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in Abeyance and Stay the Deadline for Response to the Same. Specifically, the Defendants seek to have the court hold in abeyance Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 334) and stay the deadline for their response to Plaintiffs’ Motion until discovery is complete. The court hereby grants Defendants’ motion and holds in abeyance the Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and stays the deadline for Defendants’ response until discovery is complete. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 9, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?