Southern v. Asbestos Processing LLC et al

Filing 377

ORDER re 376 Hearing on 11/20/2014 at 9:30 AM, requesting parties review Professor Jon Romberg's law review article, Half a Loaf is Predominant and Superior to None: Class Certification of Particular Issues Under Rule 23(C)(4)(A), 2002 UTAH L. REV. 249 (2002), and come to Thursday's hearing prepared to discuss suggestions contained in the article. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 11/17/2014. (bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Odell Parker; Ruth Parker; Larry Southern; Lucille Southern; and Roy Southern, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated in the State of South Carolina, Plaintiffs, -vsAsbestos Processing, LLC; Richard H. Bishoff, PC; Richard H. Bishoff; and John Deakle, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 0:11-cv-01800-JFA ORDER The parties are requested to review Professor Jon Romberg’s law review article, Half a Loaf is Predominant and Superior to None: Class Certification of Particular Issues Under Rule 23(C)(4)(A), 2002 UTAH L. REV. 249 (2002). Please come to Thursday’s hearing prepared to discuss suggestions contained in this article. The Court is particularly interested in Professor Romberg’s suggestion of what he refers to as a “partial class action.” Under this device, the Court could certify common areas in this case for collective resolution. Then, if these issues are resolved adversely to the Plaintiffs, the case is over. If, on the other hand, the Plaintiffs prevail on the class issues, then the court will proceed to try to rest of the case to judgment with the named class representatives. As to the absent class members, “after the partial class action lawsuit has ended, they may file their own individual actions, relying on the preclusive effect arising from the common issues that have already been resolved in the issue class.” 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. November 17, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?