Woodard v. Lane et al

Filing 59

ORDER re 58 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Aldi Incorporation. Prior to ruling on the pending motion, the court requires Aldi's intended substitute counsel to file a statement adopting the pro hac vice motions previously submitted and acknowledging the obligations of local counsel in compliance with Local Civil Rules 83.I.04, 83.I.05, and 83.I.06. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/25/2012. (abuc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ROCK HILL DIVISION
Susan Woodard,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Levert Lane, Aldi Incorporation, and
Brian Hammond
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on Defendant Aldi’s motion to substitute
counsel [Entry #58]. Prior to ruling on the pending motion, the court requires Aldi’s
intended substitute counsel to file a statement adopting the pro hac vice motions
previously submitted and acknowledging the obligations of local counsel in compliance
with Local Civil Rules 83.I.04, 83.I.05, and 83.I.06.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 25, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina

Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge