King v. Stevenson

Filing 62

OPINION AND ORDER denying 61 Motion and directing the Clerk to docket Petitioner's motion as a Notice of Appeal. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 7/1/2013.(jpet, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION Eugene King, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) Robert M. Stevenson, III, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ) C/A NO. 0:12-949-CMC-PJG OPINION and ORDER This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s pro se “Motion Objection Order Deny Certificate of Appealability.” ECF No. 61. On June 19, 2013, this court issued an Order and Opinion adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, and denying a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 57. To the extent Petitioner’s filing can be construed as a motion for reconsideration, it is denied for the reasons noted in the Order and Opinion. The court determines that Petitioner likely seeks review of its decision by a higher court. Accordingly, out of an abundance of caution, the Clerk is directed to docket Petitioner’s “Motion Objection” as a Notice of Appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and to forward the Notice to that court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Columbia, South Carolina July 1, 2013 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?