Michaels et al v. Agape Senior Community Inc et al

Filing 13

ORDER re 12 NOTICE of Declination of Intervention, unsealing the action and directing the complaint be served upon the defendants by the relators. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/07/2013. (bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION United States of America ex rel. BRIANNA MICHAELS and AMY WHITESIDES, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) AGAPE SENIOR COMMUNITY, ET AL., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CA No. 0:12-CV-03466-JFA FILED UNDER SEAL Order The United States having declined to intervene in this action pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B), the Court rules as follows: IT IS ORDERED that, 1. the complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendants by the relators; 2. the relators serve this Order and the Government’s Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, after service of the complaint; 3. the seal be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action; 4. the parties shall serve all pleadings and motions filed in this action, including supporting memoranda, upon the United States, as provided for in 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(3). The United States may order any deposition transcripts and is entitled to intervene in this action, for good cause, at any time; 5. the parties shall serve all notices of appeal upon the United States; 6. all orders of this Court shall be sent to the United States; and that 7. should the relators or the defendants propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise discontinued, either the relators or the defendants will solicit the written consent of the United States before presenting the matter to this court for its ruling or granting its approval. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 7, 2013 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?