Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
31
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 27 Report and Recommendation, reversing the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanding the action to the Commissioner for further consideration. Signed by Honorable Richard M. Gergel on 06/03/2014. (bshr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Bronwyn Heidi Ellen Roberts,
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 0: 13- 68-RMG
)
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
)
)
ORDER
)
Defendant.
)
)
This matter comes before the Court for judicial review of the final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs application for Supplemental Security
Income ("SSI"). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this
matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial handling. The Magistrate
Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 16, 2014 recommending that the decision of
the Commissioner be reversed and remanded to the agency. (Dkt. No. 27). The Commissioner
has filed a response to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation indicating that she
will file no objections. (Dkt. No. 29). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation
and the record evidence and finds that the Magistrate Judge has ably addressed the factual and
legal issues in this matter. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as
the order of this Court, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence
Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further
proceedings consistent with this order.
-1
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Richard Mark Ger
United States District Judge
Charleston, South Carolina
June~, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?