Klepper v. Bi-Lo

Filing 28

ORDER: If the plaintiff fails to participate in the telephone status conference, the court will be left with no recourse except to dismiss this action with prejudice under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/11/2014. (dsto, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Carolyn Diane Klepper, Plaintiff, v. Bi-Lo, Defendant. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A: 0:13-1167-JFA-TER ORDER This court has previously entered an order allowing the attorney of record for the plaintiff to withdraw. That order also informed the plaintiff of her obligation to notify this court of her new counsel’s identity or of the fact that she intended to proceed pro se or without counsel. To date, the court has heard nothing from the plaintiff.1 In an effort to determine if the plaintiff wishes to pursue this action or wishes to abandon it altogether, the court will conduct a telephonic status conference on the case at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, March 18, 2014. A notice from the Clerk informing the parties of the procedures for initiating the conference call will be mailed under separate notice. If the plaintiff fails to participate in the telephone status conference, the court will be left with no recourse except to dismiss this action with prejudice under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 11, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina 1 Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge Counsel’s motion to withdraw was based upon plaintiff’s failure to even respond to her attorney.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?