Hovind v. Anderson et al

Filing 41

JUDGMENT dismissing with prejudice as to defendants Anderson and Dial, and dismissing without prejudice as to the remaining defendants. (gmil)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Kent E. Hovind, Plaintiff v. William G. Anderson; John Doe; Mr. Dial; and 3 Unknown Named John Jane Doe, BOP Employees, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 0:13-cv-01177-MGL-PJG Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O the plaintiff, Kent E. Hovind, take nothing of the defendants, William G. Anderson and Mr. Dial, and this action is dismissed with prejudice as to those defendants. O the plaintiff, Kent E. Hovind, take nothing of the defendants, John Doe and 3Unknown Named John Jane Doe, BOP Employees, and this action is dismissed without prejudice as to those defendants.. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Court, the Honorable Mary G. Lewis, US District Judge, presiding. The Court having adopted the Report and Recommendation of US Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, granted defendants Anderson and Dial’s motion to dismiss with prejudice and, dismissed defendants John Doe and 3Unknown Named John Jane Doe without prejudice. Date: August 19, 2014 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/ G. Mills Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?