Fowler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 12/10/2015.(bshr, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James F. Fowler,
C/A No.: 0:13-cv-1726-JFA
ORDER ON MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY FEES
Carolyn C. Colvin,
Commissioner of Social Security,
This matter is before the court upon motion of plaintiff’s counsel, Daniel Mayes, for
attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Counsel has submitted
copies of the Notice of Award from the Commissioner and the plaintiff’s signed Fee
Agreement. The Commissioner has replied to the motion indicating that she withdraws her
earlier objection to the fee request as untimely.1
Plaintiff’s counsel petitions the court for approval of the federal court related fee in
the amount $29,550.22 pursuant to the terms of a written contingent-fee agreement with the
plaintiff. That contingent-fee agreement provides, in pertinent part, for the payment of
attorney fees in the amount of 25% of all past-due benefits recovered. The plaintiff’s
The Commissioner initially objected to the fee request as untimely because the notice of
award suggested that the plaintiff’s past due benefits might still be reduced if he were found to be
entitled to SSI. The Commissioner, in her sur-reply of December 9, 2015, notes that she
contacted the payment center responsible for plaintiff’s claim and a representative informed her
that the plaintiff was not entitled to any SSI payments and that his past due benefits would
therefore not be adjusted. Further, the representative confirmed that the $29,550.22 originally
withheld for attorney’s fees was accurate and final. Thus, the Commissioner withdrew her initial
attorney has previously been granted fees by this court in the amount of $4,837.50 under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
In the United States Supreme Court case of Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 780
(2002), the Court held that the provision of the Social Security Act limiting attorney fees to
25% of past-due benefits does not displace contingent-fee agreements that are within such
statutory ceiling, and instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by such
agreements. In addition, if the claimant has been awarded attorney fees under EAJA, the
claimant’s attorney must refund the lesser of the two fees to the claimant. Id. at 796.
Upon review of the material submitted to the court, the undersigned finds that plaintiff
counsel’s request for attorney fees is reasonable. Therefore, it is ordered that the plaintiff’s
attorney may collect a fee of $29,550.22 from past due benefits. Plaintiff’s attorney must
refund to the plaintiff the EAJA award of $4,837.50.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.
United States District Judge
December 10, 2015
Columbia, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?