Craig et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al

Filing 30

ORDER re 29 MOTION for Clarification of 26 Order denying 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 02/04/2014. (bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION William F. Craig, III, and F. Ragin Craig, C/A No. 0:13-cv-01767-JFA Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District; the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, in his official capacity as chief of engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Lt. Col. John T. Litz, in his official capacity as district engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District; Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Heather McTeer Toney, in her official capacity as regional administrator Region 4 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and Robert D. Lesslie, Defendants. This matter comes before the court on a motion for clarification filed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District; the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Corps officials Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick and Lt. Col. John T. Litz; and EPA officials Gina McCarthy and Heather McTeer Toney1 (collectively “Federal Defendants”). ECF No. 29. Specifically, Federal Defendants seek clarification on this court’s order, ECF No. 26, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint. Id. In the order, the court points out that there can be no claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–06, when a valid 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Heather McTeer Toney replaces Acting Administrator A. Stanley Meiburg. 1 citizen suit has been asserted under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. Because this court found that William F. Craig, III, and F. Ragin Craig (“Plaintiffs”) have a cognizable claim under the CWA citizen-suit provision, 33 U.S.C.§ 1365, the court deemed their APA claim as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 4, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?