Mullinax v. Loftis

Filing 12

ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising petitioner to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Motions granted: 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by David E Mullinax. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 5/14/2014. (abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA David E. Mullinax, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) Steve Loftis, ) ) Respondent. ) _____________________________________ ) C/A No. 0:14-409-TMC-PJG ORDER This is an action seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is a prisoner. Therefore, in the event that a limitations issue arises, Petitioner shall have the benefit of the holding in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner’s pleading was filed at the moment of delivery to prison authorities for forwarding to District Court). Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) DSC, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. On February 26, 2014, the court issued an order directing Petitioner to provide documents necessary for initial review. (ECF No. 4.) Petitioner complied with the order and this case is now in proper form. PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE: Petitioner requests to proceed without prepaying the filing fee by filing an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Form AO-240), which is construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Based on a review of Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, it is granted. (ECF No. 7.) TO THE CLERK OF COURT: The Clerk of Court shall not serve the § 2241 petition upon the Respondent because the petition is subject to dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE May 14, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?