Jackson v. Scott et al
AMENDED JUDGMENT dismissing the case. (gmil)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
Lamar Rashad Jackson,
Randy Scott, Chief of Police CPD, and
Investigator Montgomery, CPD,
Civil Action No.
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate
%, along with costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
O other: the plaintiff, Lamar Rashad Jackson, shall take nothing of the defendant, Randy Scott, from the
complaint filed and the action against Randy Scott is dismissed without prejudice.
O other: the plaintiff, Lamar Rashad Jackson, shall take nothing of the defendant, Investigator Montgomery,
from the complaint filed and this action is dismissed.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Mary G. Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding. The Court, in an order
dated 6/3/2014, having adopted the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett,
United States Magistrate Judge, dismissed the action against Randy Scott without prejudice.
O decided by the Honorable Mary G. Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding, having adopted the
Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge,
dismissed the case.
Date: April 15, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?