Mixson v. State of South Carolina et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice and without requiring respondent file a return. (gmil)

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Daniel Mark Mixson,

)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner

v.

Al Cannon,
Respondent

Civil Action No.

0:14-cv-02004-DCN

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the petitioner (name)
dollars ($
of

recover from the respondent (name)

), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate

%, along with costs.

’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)

.

O other: the petitioner, Daniel Mark Mixson, shall take nothing of the respondent, Al Cannon, as to the
petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and this action is dismissed without prejudice and without
requiring respondent to file a return
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, affirming the Report
and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which
recommended dismissal of the petition without prejudice.
Date: August 19, 2014

ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/G. Mills
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk