Mixson v. State of South Carolina et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice and without requiring respondent file a return. (gmil)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Daniel Mark Mixson, ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner v. Al Cannon, Respondent Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-02004-DCN JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the petitioner (name) dollars ($ of recover from the respondent (name) ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus post-judgment interest at the rate %, along with costs. ’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name) recover costs from the petitioner (name) . O other: the petitioner, Daniel Mark Mixson, shall take nothing of the respondent, Al Cannon, as to the petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and this action is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring respondent to file a return This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, affirming the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended dismissal of the petition without prejudice. Date: August 19, 2014 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/G. Mills Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?