Smyth v. Urch et al
Filing
26
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (gmil)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Keith A. Smyth,
Plaintiff
v.
Neal Urch and William Church,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
0:14-cv-02064-RBH-PJG
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Keith A. Smyth, shall take nothing of the defendants, Neal Urch and William Church, as to the
complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, dismissing the action without
prejudice.
Date: August 19, 2014
),
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/G. Mills
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?