Laws v. Stokes et al
Filing
83
JUDGMENT dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (gmil)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Brian Douglas Laws,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
Mrs. Stokes, R.N.; Mr. Ayers, Nurse; Mrs.
Montgomery, Nurse; Mr. Dean, Associate
Warden; Mr. Bush, Warden,
Civil Action No.
0:14-cv-02532-BHH
Defendant,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Brian Douglas Laws, shall take nothing of the defendants, Mrs. Stokes, Mr. Ayers, Mrs.
Montgomery, Mr. Dean, and Mr. Bush, and this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Court, the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge, presiding, having adopted
the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, dismissed
the complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Date: October 8, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/G. Mills
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?