Hubbard v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility et al

Filing 93

JUDGMENT dismissing this action with prejudice. (gmil)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Robert Bruce Trey Hubbard, Plaintiff v. D-3 Deputy T. Hadden; SGT W. Church; SGT K. Ashley; 1st SGT L. Pilgrim; Cpl. M. Higgins; S. Bianco, Medical Doctor; Lt. Hayes, Bravo Platoon Shift Lietenant; Cpl. L. Blackwell; and Chaplain Ken Apple, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-02910-BHH Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Robert Bruce Trey Hubbard, shall take nothing of the defendants, D-3 Deputy T. Hadden, SGT W. Church, SGT K. Ashley, 1st SGT L. Pilgrim; Cpl. M. Higgins, S. Bianco, Lt. Hayes, Cpl. L. Blackwell, and Chaplain Ken Apple, as to the complaint filed and this action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with this court’s orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge, presiding, having adopted the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which dismissed the action with prejudice. Date: October 13, 2015 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/G. Mills Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?