Frazier v. Cox et al

Filing 54

ORDER ACCEPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 39 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 6/10/2015. (gmil)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION Terrence Oneil Thomas Frazier, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Travis Cox; Georgia Richey; and Harry ) V. Irick, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) C/A No.: 0:14-cv-03068-TLW ORDER The plaintiff, Terrence Oneil Thomas Frazier, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action alleging violations of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment as to all claims against them on December 31, 2014. (ECF No. 39). This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, to whom this case was previously assigned. (ECF No. 50). In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 39). Objections were due by June 8, 2015. No objections were filed. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not 1 required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). This Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) is ACCEPTED. The Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Terry L. Wooten Chief United States District Judge June 10, 2015 Columbia, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?