Eaglin v. Sterling et al
ORDER denying without prejudice Eaglin's 211 Motion for Pauper's Copy of Transcript of Proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 10/17/2016. (bgoo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Adrian T. Eaglin,
C/A No. 0:14-4003-PJG
From August 1-2, 2016, a jury trial was conducted in this civil rights action, resulting in a
jury verdict in favor of the defendant. Currently before the court is Plaintiff Adrian T. Eaglin’s
“Motion for Pauper’s Transcript.” (ECF No. 211.) Specifically, Eaglin requests preparation of a
transcript of the pretrial conference, jury selection, plaintiff’s case-in-chief, and defendant’s case-inchief at government expense for inclusion in the appellate record, citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c).
Section 1915 permits an in forma pauperis litigant to proceed without the prepayment of fees.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Subsection (c) specifically provides that,
the court may direct payment by the United States of the expenses of (1) printing the
record on appeal in any civil or criminal case, if such printing is required by the
appellate court; (2) preparing a transcript of proceedings before a United States
magistrate judge in any civil or criminal case, if such transcript is required by the
district court, in the case of proceedings conducted under section 636(b) of this title
or under section 3401(b) of title 18, United States Code; and (3) printing the record
on appeal if such printing is required by the appellate court, in the case of
proceedings conducted pursuant to section 636(c) of this title. Such expenses shall
be paid when authorized by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United
28 U.S.C. § 1915(c). Preparation of a transcript is permitted under this subsection for proceedings
before a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) when required by the district court. However,
Eaglin’s jury trial was conducted under § 636(c). Thus, § 1915(c) would allow the court to consider
Page 1 of 2
authorizing the government to pay the expense of printing the record on appeal; however, unlike
§ 1915(c)(2), subsection (c)(3) does not specifically address payment for preparation of a transcript
for appeal. Moreover, even if § 1915(c)(3) applied to preparation of the transcript for appeal, the
court finds that Eaglin has failed to demonstrate that the entire transcript is required by the appellate
court at this time.1 The court also observes that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit has access to the district court’s file in this case.
Finally, the court observes that for appeal purposes, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) provides that fees for
transcripts furnished to civil in forma pauperis litigants shall be paid by the United States “if the trial
judge or circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous (but presents a substantial question).”
28 U.S.C. § 753(f). However, Eaglin has not addressed this standard.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that Eaglin’s motion is DENIED without prejudice at this time. The court notes
that Eaglin may renew his request for the transcript at government expense with the Court of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 17, 2016
Columbia, South Carolina
Paige J. Gossett
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The court notes that Eaglin alleges that his issues on appeal concern the sealing of the juror
questionnaires and the number of jurors seated in this civil trial.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?