Ward v. United States of America et al

Filing 83

JUDGMENT dismissing the case against United States of America, Charles Samuels, Newton E. Kendig, Warden M. Cruz, Doctor Victor Loranth, and John/Jane Doe without prejudice and dismissing the case against Sharon Poston with prejudice. (gmil)

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Larry Ward,
Plaintiff

v.
United States of America; Federal Bureau of
Prisons; Director Charles Samuels, in his official and
individual capacities; Rear Admiral Newton E.
Kendig, M.D., in his official and individual
capacities; Warden M. Cruz, in her official and
individual capacities; Doctor Victor Loranth, in his
official and individual capacities; John/Jane Doe,
Statutory Agent Officers, in their individual and
official capacities; David M. Woodbury, M.D.;
Timothy R. Wagner, M.D.; Sharon Poston, CEO,

Civil Action No.

0:14-cv-04762-DCN

)
)
)
)
)

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)

recover from the defendant (name)

which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of

dollars ($

),

%, along with

costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

O the plaintiff, Larry Ward, shall take nothing of the defendants, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David M. Woodbury, and
Timothy R. Wagner, and the case against these defendants was dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and
service of process.
O other: The plaintiff, Larry Ward, shall take nothing of the defendants, United States of America, Charles Samuels,
Rear Admiral Newton E. Kendig, Warden M. Cruz, Doctor Victor Loranth, and John/Jane Doe, as to the complaint filed
and the action against these defendants was dismissed without prejudice.
O other: The plaintiff, Larry Ward, shall take nothing of the defendant, Sharon Poston, as to the complaint filed and the
action against this defendant was dismissed with prejudice.

This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, having affirmed the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, Paige J. Gossett, which dismissed defendants Federal Bureau of
Prisons, David M. Woodbury, and Timothy R. Wagner, without prejudice.
O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, having affirmed the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, Paige J. Gossett, which granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
against defendants United States of America, Charles Samuels, Newton E. Kendig, Warden M. Cruz, Doctor Victor
Loranth, and John/Jane Doe without prejudice. It was further ordered that the case against Sharon Poston was dismissed
with prejudice.
Date: October 28, 2015

ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/G. Mills
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk