Vitalis v. Stirling et al

Filing 20

JUDGMENT dismissing the Complaint without prejudice. (gmil)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Hamid Yazid Vitalis, Plaintiff v. Bryan Stirling, Director; Sandra Barrett, Division Dir Program Services; and Bernard McKie, KCI Warden, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 0:15-cv-01053-PMD Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) dollars ($ of recover from the defendant (name) ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus post-judgment interest at the rate %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Hamid Yazid Vitalis, shall take nothing of the defendants, Bryan Stirling, Sandra Barrett, and Bernard McKie, from the complaint filed and this action is dismissed without prejudice. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy, United States District Judge, presiding, having adopted the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which dismissed the complaint without prejudice. Date: June 18, 2015 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/G. Mills Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?