Parker v. Boise Cascade Corp et al
Filing
73
ORDER directing Plaintiff to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendant's 66 MOTION TO DISMISS by July 26, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 7/12/2016. (mwal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Anthony Parker,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Boise Cascade Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A No.: 0:15-2871-DCN-SVH
ORDER
Anthony Parker (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought
this action alleging he was wrongfully terminated. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss
the amended complaint on June 2, 2016. [ECF No. 66]. As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se,
the court entered an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.
1975), advising him of the importance of the motion and of the need for him to file an
adequate response by July 8, 2016. [ECF No. 67]. Plaintiff was specifically advised that
if he failed to respond adequately, Defendant’s motion may be granted. Id.
Notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions set forth in the court’s
Roseboro order, Plaintiff failed to properly respond to the motion. As such, it appears to
the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Based on
the foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with
this case and to file a response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss by July 26, 2016.
Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for
dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70
(4th Cir. 1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 12, 2016
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?