Wardell v. Mansukhani
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
W. Robert Wardell, Jr.
Andrew Mansukhani, Warden, FCI Estill,
Civil Action No.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the petitioner (name)
recover from the respondent (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with
’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)
O other: the petitioner, W. Robert Wardell, Jr., shall take nothing of the respondent, Andrew Mansukhani, and this case
is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommending
dismissing the petition without prejudice.
Date: August 8, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?