Groth v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
8
ORDER notifying the plaintiff she shall have until August 29, 2016 to provide the court with proof of service of the Complaint upon the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1) or show good cause for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 08/22/2016. (bshr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Shirley Dianne Groth,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of )
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )
C/A No. 0:16-1581-JMC-PJG
ORDER
This social security action is before this court pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 405(g) for review of
a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The plaintiff, Shirley
Dianne Groth (“Plaintiff”), initiated this action and filed her Complaint on May 17, 2016. (ECF No.
1.)
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that a plaintiff must serve a defendant within 90
days after the complaint is filed and, unless service is waived, must provide proof of service to the
court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l)(1) and 4(m). As of the date of this order, more than 90 days has passed
since the Plaintiff initiated this action by filing her Complaint, and the Plaintiff has not filed proof
of service with the court. It is therefore
ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have until August 29, 2016 to provide the court with
proof of service of the Complaint upon the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(l)(1), or show good cause for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4(m). Failure to do so
will result in this case being dismissed for failure to serve. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 22, 2016
Columbia, South Carolina
____________________________________
Paige J. Gossett
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?