Scott v. Cannon et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. on 12/6/2017. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Nathan Scott, III, Petitioner, v. Sheriff Al Cannon; Chief Beatty, Respondents. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No. 0:17-2772-HMH-PJG ORDER Petitioner, Nathan Scott, III, a pro se state pretrial detainee, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. By order issued October 19, 2017, Petitioner was provided an opportunity to submit the documents necessary to bring the case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. (ECF No. 3.) Petitioner was warned that failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period would subject the case to dismissal. Petitioner did not respond to the Order and the time for response has lapsed. Petitioner has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court. Therefore, the case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. December 6, 2017 Greenville, South Carolina s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr. Senior United States District Judge NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?