Johnson v. Williams

Filing 22

ORDER denying Petitioner's 19 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/2/2018. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA James Edward Johnson, Jr., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Charles Williams, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) _____________________________________ ) C/A No. 0:18-673-BHH-PJG ORDER Petitioner James Edward Johnson, Jr., a self-represented state prisoner, filed this habeas action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the court on petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 19.) There is no right to appointed counsel in habeas cases. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Hunt v. Nuth, 57 F.3d 1327, 1340 (4th Cir. 1995). Attorneys may be appointed for a person “seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255 of title 28” when “the court determines that the interests of justice so require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Counsel may be appointed when counsel is necessary for effective discovery and must be appointed when evidentiary hearings are required. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rules 6(a) & 8(c), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. At this time, no evidentiary hearing has been set in this case and the questions presented are not so complex as to require an attorney to effectively argue them for the Petitioner. Accordingly, the Petitioner’s request for counsel to be appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B), is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 2, 2018 Columbia, South Carolina ____________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?