Young v. Antonelli

Filing 77

ORDER granting the 2241 application, vacating Petitioner's sentence, and setting re-sentencing for 2:30pm on April 27, 2021. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 1/8/2021. (mmcd)

0:18-cv-01010-CMC

Date Filed 01/08/21

Entry Number 77

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ROCK HILL DIVISION
William Young,

vs.
B.M. Antonelli,

Civil Action No. 0:18-1010-CMC
Petitioner,

ORDER

Respondent.

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus filed in
this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, arguing a change in law renders his sentence, as enhanced
pursuant to the “death results” sentencing guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(1), infirm. ECF No. 1.
Specifically, he argued Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014), interpreting the “death
results” statutory provision at 18 U.S.C. § 841, also applies to § 2D1.1(a)(1). Respondent opposed,
arguing Petitioner waived his challenge to the application of the enhancement, and that Petitioner
could not satisfy the test in United States v. Wheeler, 886 F.3d 415, 428 (4th Cir. 2018), to qualify
under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). ECF No. 33-1. The matter was referred to
Magistrate Judge Gossett, who entered a Report and Recommendation recommending the matter
be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ECF No. 45. 1
This court adopted the Report in part and dismissed Petitioner’s application for lack of
jurisdiction, concluding Burrage had not been held to apply to the Guidelines and Petitioner’s

1

The Report also recommended finding Petitioner waived his Burrage-based argument. Id.

0:18-cv-01010-CMC

Date Filed 01/08/21

Entry Number 77

Page 2 of 3

attempt to utilize Burrage was premature. ECF No. 59. 2 Petitioner appealed to the Fourth Circuit.
ECF No. 61. After oral argument, the Fourth Circuit determined that although neither it nor the
Supreme Court had applied Burrage to the Guidelines at the time this court considered the issue,
Burrage does apply to the “death results” provision in § 2D1.1(a)(1). ECF No. 70. Therefore,
although this court was correct when it found no jurisdiction at the time it considered the
application, Burrage now applies to Petitioner’s claim. Accordingly, the appellate court remanded
for further proceedings. ECF No. 70.
After the mandate issued, the court held a teleconference with counsel. ECF No. 73. The
Government informed the court it would not pursue the waiver argument, and agreed Petitioner is
entitled to relief given the Fourth Circuit’s decision. See Young v. Antonelli, __ F.3d __, 2020 WL
7251007 (4th Cir. Dec. 10, 2020).
Accordingly, as the Fourth Circuit has determined Burrage applies to the “death results”
guideline, and the Government agrees Petitioner is entitled to relief, the court hereby grants the
§2241 application, vacates Petitioner’s sentence, and sets resentencing for 2:30pm on April 27,
2021. The United States Probation Office is directed to prepare and file an Amended Presentence
Report in advance of resentencing. The Federal Public Defender is reappointed to represent
Petitioner at resentencing.

2

The court declined to adopt the Report as to waiver, finding it need not reach a conclusion on the
issue due to lack of jurisdiction but noting it appeared Petitioner had not waived this claim. Id. at
6.
2

0:18-cv-01010-CMC

Date Filed 01/08/21

Entry Number 77

Page 3 of 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Cameron McGowan Currie
CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE
Senior United States District Judge

Columbia, South Carolina
January 8, 2021

3