Savani v. Washington Safety Management Solutions LLC et al
Filing
312
AMENDED JUDGMENT in part pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) for both parties on different sub-groups within the Subclass. It is ordered that partial final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants for those members of the Subclass who are not currently entitled to receive any benefits and partial final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs for those members of the Subclass who are currently owed past benefits. (asni, )
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
NOORALI “SAM” SAVANI and ROBERT P.
TAYLOR, Jr.individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs
v.
Civil Action No.
1:06-2805-JMC
URS PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS LLC
formerly WASHINGTON SAFETY
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
formerly WESTINGHOUSE SAFETY
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
and WASHINGTON SAFETY
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC’s
PENSION PLAN, now URS
PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS
PENSION PLAN formerly WSMS
PENSION PLAN,
WASHINGTON GROUP
INTERNATIONAL, INC. now known as
URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, Inc.
and ROGER ALLEN,
JULIE TSCHIDA BROWN,
DAVE HOLLAN, AND DELOYD CAZIER
as TRUSTEES and MEMBERS of
the BENEFITS now
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
of URS PROFESSIONAL
SOLUTIONS PENSION PLAN,
Defendants
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
dollars ($
recover from the defendant (name)
), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with costs.
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
O other: final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 54 (b) is entered in favor of Defendants on the merits of
Plaintiffs’ claim for benefits only under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) for those members of the Subclass who are not
currently owed any supplemental benefits and without prejudice to other potential claims by such individuals
who have not elected or did not elect early retirement. The court further orders, consistent with the previous
orders and findings of this court, that members of the Subclass who are not currently owed any supplement
benefits shall be entitled to such benefits if and when they meet the requirements of Section 4.12 (a) of the
plan in the future. For purposes of this Order, the term “Subclass” shall include members of the “Class” as
those terms are defined by this Court’s order dated August 28, 2012 (Doc. No. 204). As such, the Court hereby
enters final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 (b) on the claims asserted in this matter with respect to the
Subclass as follows:
1. Because the WSMS Plan earned on average a 5.75% annual rate of return on assets from January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2013, and because the Parties agree and have stipulated to the use of 5.75% as an
appropriate annual rate to calculate pre-judgment interest for damages for the members of the Subclass who
are currently owed past benefits, pre-judgment interest shall be paid to the members of the Subclass on past
due benefits at a rate of 5.75% compounded annually;
2. Within thirty (30) business days of the date of the entry of this order, Defendant URS Professional
Solutions Plan (the “Plan”) shall pay or cause to be paid the past supplemental benefits owed to the members
of the Subclass identified in the Exhibit attached to this Order (Exhibit 3) who are owed supplemental benefits
up through and including the month of August 2013, with prejudgment interest, in accordance with the
amounts identified in Exhibit 3 attached to this Order, Defendant URS Professional Solutions Plan (the
“Plan”) shall timely pay to or cause to be paid the supplemental benefits owed to the members of the Subclass
on a monthly basis as such benefits are due in accordance with Section 4.12(a) of the Plan.
3. For those members of the Subclass identified in the Exhibit attached to this Order (Exhibit 3) who
are not currently owed any supplemental benefits under the terms of Section 4.12(a) of the Plan, no
supplemental benefits are currently due. Therefore, the Defendants are awarded judgment in their favor with
regard to such Subclass members on the merits of those Plaintiffs’ claim for benefits only under ERISA §
502(a)(1)(B), without prejudice to other potential claims by such individuals who have not elected or did not
elect early retirement. This judgment confirms that Subclass members are entitled to receive accrued
supplemental benefits under Section 4.12 of the Plan if and when such Subclass members meet the
requirements of Section 4.12 of the plan.
4. Consistent with all prior orders and opinions of the Court, this Court declares with regard to such
Subclass members that they have a right to the accrued supplemental benefits under Section 4.12 of the Plan. If
and when these Subclass members meet the remaining requirements of Section 4.12 of the Plan, Defendant
URS Professional Solutions Plan (the “Plan”) shall pay or cause to be paid the supplemental benefits owed to
those members of the Subclass on a monthly basis as such benefits are due in accordance with Section 4.12(a)
of the Plan.
O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge presiding. The Court having
entered an order on plaintiffs’ motion for bifurcated monetary judgment regarding the subclass.
CLERK OF COURT
Date: December 13, 2013
s/Angie Snipes
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?